this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
246 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

61081 readers
3079 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (30 children)

I would not risk 36TB of data on a single drive let alone a Seagate. Never had a good experience with them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Ignoring the Seagate part, which makes sense... Is there a reason with 36TB?

I recall IT people losing their minds when we hit the 1TB, when the average hard drive was like 80GB.

So this growth seems right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's so consistent it has a name: Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit (IC) doubles about every two years. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law

I heard that we were at the theoretical limit but apparently there's been a break through: https://phys.org/news/2020-09-bits-atom.html

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Quick note, HDD storage is not using transistors to store the data, so is not really directly related to Moore's law. SSDs do use transistors/nano structures (NAND) for storage and it's storage capacity is more related to Moore's law.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)