this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7218 readers
407 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The most depressing part is he legitimately might win.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

And if he doesn't legitimately win, he will make damn sure he wins illegitimately.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

More depressing would be the victory of "outworld" Biden. The most depressing thing here is that nobody looks at the young candidates, like they don't exist or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I think we're all pretty bummed that we "have to" vote for Biden. He sucks. He's also the candidate of a party in a 2 party system. We have no choice. It is a shitty system. I'm confident that in a more democratic system of representation (abolish the electoral college, implement ranked-choice voting, etc) we would all spend considerably more time talking about "the best" candidates that match our views most closely, but unfortunately in this country there's really not much point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Biden is a flip flopping coward, but I fail to see how electing him would be "more depressing" than wannabe Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Very few look at Biden as anything more than a, "Block Trump from office" vote. People aren't voting for biden, they are voting for the only one who stands a chance at being elected when pit against Trump

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Old man not perfect, better burn the country down

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The country built on genocide and slavery? Yeah maybe you should start fresh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Electing Trump does not qualify as "starting fresh" though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That would be the burning the country down part, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Accelerationism had never failed before, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference between burning something down and handing control (back) over to a kleptocrat.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Genocidal country has choice between genocidal kleptocrat and genocidal Zionist.

Oops all genocide lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

America in a nutshell: "Oops! All genocide :)"

They really aren't the same though. The lesser of two evils is still less evil.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Well, one wants to commit genocide in the USA, while the other merely supports a genocide abroad. In the absence of a good choice, you can make the utilitarian argument for the least bad choice.