Explain Like I'm Five

14584 readers

3 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

ELI5: If Trump claims he won in 2020, wouldn't the 22nd amendment make him ineligible to be president for this upcoming term? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The 22nd amendment states "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

Quantifying that, if he won in 2020, that would mean that he's been elected more than twice, making this upcoming term invalid. Couldn't the Democrats just say that he won in 2020, and then tell him he can't be president this time? What would be the repercussions to what Biden has done if that were to happen? What else am I missing? I'm hoping the hive mind here can help me be better informed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No. I think being "elected" means winning the actual electoral votes and having the results certified.

If he really did had his victory "stolen" (which there were insufficient evidence of btw), then that would would not qualify in sense of the 22nd amendment, since the electors voted Biden and congress certified Biden, so the orange dickhead legally were only elected to one term.

Someone's claims have no legal weight. (just like a "concession" does not have legal weight either)

TLDR: Basically if orange dickhead's claim is "I should have been legally declared winner, but did not because 'it was stolen by democrats'" then its not really inconsistent.