this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
184 points (97.4% liked)

Global News

3823 readers
465 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A massive increase in defense spending is set to hit Greenland in a move that would allow the Artic territory to fortify its military’s strength.

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20241225164949/https://www.rawstory.com/greenland-2670671719/

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawstory.com%2Fgreenland-2670671719%2F

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

NATO does not prevent war. The term "defensive pact" is bullshit. NATO has always been a geopoltical aggressor. Its an appendage if US empire

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don’t you hate it when your war prevention alliance has been at war for thirty years straight

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Its literally the worst war prevention alliance ever, but of course, the actual purpose of a thing is what it does

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You are arguing against something I haven't said. Yes, US missuses NATO for their own purposes, I stated that in the first comment in this thread...

But that won't change just because NATO gets disbanded without changing the systemic issues that created NATO in the first place. Because it will just be re-born under a different name with the same stated goals and the same US in the driver seat. So instead of that lets address the root causes so that NATO becomes obsolete and makes it useless vehicle hence preventing US from using it as a vehicle for their aggression and imperialism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the systemic issues that created NATO in the first place

The systemic issue that created it in the furst place is US imperialism. The US doesn't misuse NATO because its will is the only point of NATO.

What do you think the systemic issue is? You keep refering to it without naming it and act as if it deflects critisism of NATO instead of condemning it, which does not seem obvious to me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What do you think the systemic issue is?

Read the full comment. It literally answers it.

<...> act as if it deflects critisism of NATO instead of condemning it <...>

Nowhere did I deflect from the harm NATO has done. It's your position that maintaining status quo is preferable to addressing the root cause since it's fine with you if new NATO is born with a new name (lets call it MATO) as long as NATO specifically is dead.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Read the full comment. It literally answers it.

No it doesnt. You just say systemic issues and root causes and that they need to be addressed, you never say what they are. I said what i think the issue is its the US, i have no clue what you think it is

It's your position that maintaining status quo is preferable to addressing the root cause since it's fine with you if new NATO is born with a new name (lets call it MATO) as long as NATO specifically is dead.

That's not my position lol. That's the most overly simplistic read of my saying Death to NATO you could possibly take. "Death to NATO - I'm totally for the status quo though just as long as its not called NATO." I wonder what you think it means when we say Death to America lol