this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
18 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We should be very worried if the finances are so bad they are now going after the 17% (the numbers are prob a bit more skewed as I assume a higher % of that 17 is a high volume user)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I too believe that the percentage of high volume users is higher. The graph shows the ammount of users that access the internet regardless of the device. I assume that about 2/3 of those users access the internet with a smartphone exclusively, implying that these users don't use an ad blocker at all, since the word hasn't spread to an extend that everyone uses one.

The remaining third of all users access the internet with a browser on a desktop computer. It is very hard to estimate who uses ad blockers, as I can't find any reliable resources. It depends on the peer group one is a part of. When I look into my social group, only three out of ten users do have an adblocker installed (me included) - and for two of those I had them introduced to ad blockers and set it up for them.

On the other hand: I assume that the combination of Firefox and UBlock Origin would apply to 90% of Fediverse / Lemmy users.