this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
31 points (94.3% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

10672 readers
112 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll busmittions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissure Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"
01-24 Film "Section 31"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In comparison to many other series that have come in this era (because we all love to compare!), the stakes are as profound as any that we’ve seen, but with a particular character driven twist that I hope will surprise and delight people who watch the movie.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

the stakes are as profound as any that we’ve seen

That's not a selling point. I'm truly tired of the world ending all the time. What's wrong with smaller more personal stakes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Smaller more personal stakes" doesn't mean something will be good, either!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never mentioned good or bad.
I don't really care if something is "good or bad". I only care if I like it or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ok sorry, where I'm from saying you are "truly tired" of something implies you think it's bad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I agree it's overused for the average episode of Trek, but if we accept that they're doing a Section 31 movie, what's the point of a low-stakes feature film (even a streaming film), especially one centered around Section 31?

Also worth noting that the article describes it as "Big stakes emotionally, big stakes for the characters in our story", so the "stakes" are referring at least in part to character stakes, not necessarily universe-ending stakes. (Though I admit in practice it will probably be both.)

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago

It's going to suck so hard.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Srsly. What happened to, "oh, what an interesting planet, let's explore it..."?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A mild counterpoint, because I totally get where you're coming from:

Section 31 is probably the one setting that should be high stakes, all the time. Like them or not, this is kind of what they do.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You are both right, which is part of why this whole concept is dull. How many times can they threaten to destroy all universes ever?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Canonically it's 47

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

At least once more, as always.