this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
90 points (88.8% liked)

Fediverse

28721 readers
70 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn't sure if [email protected] or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I disagree with the conservatives part. Their ideology does not deserve a place at the adults' table. It is far too bent on undermining democracy, equity, and egalitarian society.

EDIT: To clarify, this is elementary "Paradox of Tolerance". Those that wish to undermine democracy in an equitable society cannot be tolerated without making an end to democracy inevitable. Not all opinions are created equal. For example: "I think trans people should receive additional state-funded support." and "I think that trans people should be murdered and/or the state should cultivate an environment amplifying their likelihood to commit suicide." (the prevailing view expressed by the far-right through their actions and legislation) are opinions that should not be given equal treatment.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Saying, "I don't like what they say so they shouldn't have a voice" sounds a lot like undermining democracy to me. Them living in conservative echo chambers doesn't increase dialog or challenge their beliefs either. Divided media and divided opinions are the tools to take down a nation. Supporting this kind of division strikes me as an example of the main kind of foreign interference this country is crumbling because of. If that was your goal, I guess congratulations?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Paradox of Tolerance. Those that intend to undermine a just and equitable society that tolerates the existence of all kinds of people cannot be tolerated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But do we actually wait until we see how people think, or just silence them based on their opinion on one or twy divisive issues as a litmus test to justify our own intolerance? "They don't support trans women in women sports so none of their opinions are valid."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's, unfortunately, very subjective. A statement like that could be from a place of ignorance that they are willing to dig into and grow as a person. Any judgement has to include whether good faith is intended, etc. Conservativism itself is incompatible with motion towards a more just world, as rigid hierarchy is part of its core, and it is also an ideology rife with bad faith actors. Giving extra space for such an ideology that already has a far louder voice than it should have does not result in anything productive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yep, paradox of tolerance. We shouldn't bend over for far-right, or even fascists for the sake of "pure tolerance".