this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
758 points (99.0% liked)

World News

36884 readers
1163 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Even conventional detonations on top of nuclear reactors or nuclear stockpiles?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The US doesn't have small enough nuclear penetrators to even try hiding something anyway, they can use tactical warheads as bunker busters but they can't be meaningfully hidden. Meanwhile all these Iranian installations have been built with conventional bunker busters in mind so the existing American GBUs that must have been used may not have caused much real damage after all even if they double tapped the exact same spot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Different blast pattern, different fallout pattern, different isotopes, different seismic signature, different sound wave pattern…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes. Only in fantasy land. As Logi above said, nuclear detonation is an extremely precise, controlled process that has very specific conditions to achieve successfully. Even an actual fission bomb only manages to consume a fraction of the radioactive material.

The only thing someone would achieve by denotating a conventional explosive near a reactor or nuclear stockpile is spreading highly radioactive dust around. That does not nor will ever look like uncontrolled nuclear fission, let alone a detonation from a thermonuclear warhead.