Microblog Memes

6027 readers

1876 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

955

Which CEOs are actually worth keeping around? (i.imgur.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

394 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Pirates had some of the purest forms of democracy. Their captains were democratically elected in many cases as well. Not sure why they came to mind when you said this... But if your going to rip people off, and democratically pick your leader, pirates formed your company right

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Seems like the pirate environment is especially suited to this type of democracy. Pirate ships operate outside the protections afforded by law, so the only thing really preventing pirate captains from being ousted (or murdered) is the crew's support.

I guess a CEO would need to maintain shareholder support, but shareholders are generally fairly disconnected from the company's day to day operations. Most individuals own shares through mutual funds or ETFs, which means they don't actually have share ownership themselves and can't vote. All you have is the fund owing you a fiduciary duty to vote in your best interests, which generally translates to whatever makes the most money. So the CEO just needs to keep a few large institutions happy, and possibly some large wealthy individual shareholders that he knows from the rotary club (where the heads of aforementioned institutions are also members)

In other words, the way the financial system is set up systematically deprives the less wealthy from their right to have a say in the operation of the companies they nominally own a part of.