TechTakes

2061 readers

75 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

380

AI coders think they’re 20% faster — but they’re actually 19% slower (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

podcast version
video version

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What fascinates me is why coders who use LLMs think they’re more productive.

As @[email protected] wrote, LLM usage has been compared to gambling addiction: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/05/generative-ai-runs-on-gambling-addiction-just-one-more-prompt-bro/

I wonder to what extent this might explain this phenomenon. Many gambling addicts aren't fully aware of their losses, either, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

The reward mechanism in the brain is triggered when you bet. I think it also triggers a second time when you do win, but I'm not sure. So, yeah, sometimes the LLM spits out something good, and your brain rewards you already when you ask it. Hence, you probably do feel better, because you constantly get hits dopamine.