this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

21186 readers
152 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OC below by @[email protected]

What called my attention is that assessments of AI are becoming polarized and somewhat a matter of belief.

Some people firmly believe LLMs are helpful. But programming is a logical task and LLMs can't think - only generate statistically plausible patterns.

The author of the article explains that this creates the same psychological hazards like astrology or tarot cards, psychological traps that have been exploited by psychics for centuries - and even very intelligent people can fall prey to these.

Finally what should cause alarm is that on top that LLMs can't think, but people behave as if they do, there is no objective scientifically sound examination whether AI models can create any working software faster. Given that there are multi-billion dollar investments, and there was more than enough time to carry through controlled experiments, this should raise loud alarm bells.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What's the difference between copying a function from stack overflow and copying a function from a llm that has copied it from SO?

LLM are sort of a search engine with advanced language substitution features nothing more nothing less.

But people just love their drama, and others feed on dooming prophecies.

As for the lack of ""scientifically proof of faster software using llm""... What a statement! Give me the scientifically proof of why using neovim is faster or using a lsp is faster, or anything a developer uses while building software is """"scientifically faster"""

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it's not a plain copy but an Interpretation of SO.

With llm you just have one more layer between you and the information that can distort that information.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And?

The issue is that you should not blindly trust code. Being originally written by a human being is not, by any means, a quality certification.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You asked what's the difference and I just told you.

Are you stupid or something?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Block and reported.

You should not insult people.