this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
569 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59448 readers
3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm fairly sure that all newly built houses in the UK require solar by law.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

All the new houses around here with no solar would indicate that is not true. They're not even required to have a south facing roof.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

At least here in California, having solar panels on a non south facing roof usually only reduces production by 10-20%, as long as it's not entirely north facing. Solar systems are often slightly undersized - it's more cost effective to size it so it handles average load rather than the summer peaks you only see for a few weeks per year - so the actual difference for a given system may be less.

With my system, I see the best output from south-east facing panels since they get the morning sun. West facing panels are also fairly popular here due to time-of-use electricity plans. Some electricity plans have peak pricing from 4 to 9 pm, so people want to try and collect as much sunlight as possible during that period before sunset.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

The UK is a lot further north, and it's probably not a massive loss.

It was enough to prevent me getting "free" solar panels (while that was a thing) though, so I'm still salty about that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They're installing ridiculously small systems so that they're barely compliant, but the systems aren't very useful to the people that buy the house.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

It is very poorly implemented. "Builder grade" solar panels in a "smallest compliant" configuration with no concern for architecture to benefit from solar takes place. Builders are intentionally putting the shittiest solar to reduce value of the homes they build so that they can complain about the policy.