Science Memes

11047 readers

3453 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1170

Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 235 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And the study was even proven wrong in the 17th century. A finite amount of monkeys already produced Shakespeare in a finite amount of time; it took roughly 55 million years.

Source: Primates show up in the fossil records, dating to roughly 55mill years. And Shakespeare's complete works were most likely completed by William Shakespeare, a famous decendant of said primates.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Primates ≠ monkeys

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're all apes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

And apes are monkeys

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If baboons and macaques are monkeys, and if howlermonkeys and spidermonkeys are monkeys, humans MUST be monkeys.

Because they can ONLY both be monkeys if their common ancestor was also a monkey and we share that very same common ancestor. In fact we are closer related to macaques and baboons than to spidermonkeys, which means we share a more recent common ancestor with old world monkeys than both us and the other old world monkeys share with the new world monkeys.

Cladistically, you can not outgrow your ancestry.

Humans are apes, apes are a subgroup of monkeys, monkeys are a subgroub of primates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Monkeys are specifically non-ape simians.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Monkeys are a social construct. Like trees.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

If trees aren't real, how can our birds be real?

...I am so sorry

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Simiiformes is a clear and distinct clade.

There is no such thing for trees, because "tree" is a botanical classification, not a cladistical one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Simiiformes is a clear and distinct clade.

Yes but who says that specific clade maps to the colloquial taxonomic word "monkey"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If you go back far enough they do.