this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
239 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59069 readers
3743 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They still have the hockey stick around as a reminder to Atlas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I don't even understand why they would lie about that. There's loads of uses for a humanoid remote controlled body.

Domain experts that need to carry out dangerous tasks, people being able to carry out tasks at distant locations without the hassle of actually traveling there - very useful when you only intermittently require a physical presence.

I have long since thought that bomb diffusing should be done via a robotic body. Much better to risk a replaceable humanoid drone than the whole human.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

those are the basic requirements of being a con artist and a cult

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

To cover up his lies and false promises.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Because the point of Tesla bots is to replace workers, not allow them to be comfortable

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

From the couch, I don't understand why a humanoid body would be best for this... We humans have to work with what we initially had, but why wouldn't a robot be better? Seems like even a wheeled/threaded cart, or a quadruped with arms could be more practical in a lot of situations...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because a human body has no capability of controlling a non-human design. My fingers bend the way human fingers bend, I can't make them do anything else.

If you all design an interface to emulate human behavior then it needs to have human capabilities and human limits otherwise I can't control it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

The idea isn't to be hyper specialized to a specific task. It's to be hyper generalized to fit into spots already being filled by human workers. The goal is for the machine to be placed in the role of a paid human worker without the need to specialize anything else in the environment, a drop-in automation solution.