politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Is this really a thing? I know about "First Lady" and I think that's fine, but "first daughter"? That's kinda whack.
Bro they got first dogs, too
You can learn all about it in the 2004 documentary First Daughter
It's a commonly used term. The President's family is the First Family. All children are the First Son/First Daughter even if there are several siblings. "First Lady" isn't an official term; it's not mentioned in the Constitution as an actual position but traditionally it is a thing.
The first time I heard this term, I was so confused both as a young kid and as a child of immigrants (at that time, English was not my first language).
I couldn't understand why they were first and then when another president came in they were first again.
Okay so let’s say the president’s grandchild also lives there. Is this the second?
Since it has no official meaning anyone can use it as they see fit.
"First Grandchild" has been used previously (mostly tabloids), but I think the "first" term is usually limited to immediate family
Is it still "First Lady" if the marriage is morganatic?
By definition? No.
But if there was a situation like that, I'm willing to bet people would default to using the "first" title anyway out of custom.
Nope, First Grandchild (or possibly just ignored). "Second" is for the VP.
Doug Emhoff is currently the "Second Gentleman"
I feel like that’s a duh moment. There’s egg in my beard, pardon me.
Eh, I feel worse knowing how easily accessible that knowledge was for me. I'm sure your brain was temporarily occupied by useful knowledge
I just lack information recall, and prefer interaction via asking humans over a search. It’s definitely something I knew, hence the duh.
I was alluding to recall vs. implicit memory, but yeah. I wasn't suggesting that you didn't know the fact, I'm suggesting that perhaps your mind is less filled with the noise of factoids shouting themselves out at you.
I hope I'm correct in this assumption. Everyone deserves to be able to sit in personal silence.
Oh my misunderstanding sorry if it came across with any sort of tone. You’re not wrong in that at all, always some kind of chaos.
she has a sister who would probably be miffed at being second for some reason