this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
467 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

58975 readers
4135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I literally said just having less children.

And I'm totally ok to only having between one or zero children myself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

China tried it, didn't go too well... good luck trying it on a global scale...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Derived problems were product of a sexist society should be avoidable, you know, ending sexism...

Or are you supporting that people should be able to want male babies over female ones?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oooooh, of course, how could i forget? Blame the cis white male and the patriarchy, or course!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Literally the only big problem with china one-child policy, was that sexist parents were practicing selective abortions to ensure that they get one male kid.

No sexism = no problem

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Chinas problem was also a still very uneducated and traditionalist populace, that insisted on having boys as heirs. Leading to abortions or straight up murder of female infants. That wouldn't really be a global issue I beleive