Science Memes

11047 readers

3584 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1153

Clever, clever (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

202 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

In theory, methods like nightshades are supposed to poison the work such that AI systems trained on them will have their performance degraded significantly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

The problem with nightshade or similar tools is, that if you leave the changes it makes at too weak a setting, then it can be pretty easily removed. For example GAN upscalers that pre date modern "AI", were pretty much built to remove noise or foreign patterns. And if you make the changes strong enough that they can't be removed by these models (because so much information was lost), then the image looks like shit. Its really difficult to strike a balance here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Read it. I don't think it will have bigger impact than lossy image compression or noisy raytraced images.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If it can be added programatically it can be removed programatically. It's bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hashing enters the chat

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, I guess cryptography is just fraudulent, who knew

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's funny