this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
-27 points (25.5% liked)
Open Source
30924 readers
69 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The kernel and its changes are open source, you can just look at the changes that were made.
Your words, not mine. If they were afraid of malicious code coming from these sources they would've removed them earlier and not only after their legal department recommend these maintainers be removed.
Open source doesn't mean that malicious code isn't impossible though. For a project as large as the Linux kernel it is unlikely, but see the xz-utils incident earlier this year for example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor
Yes I expected that argument. My point was there was no valid reason to remove them. The xz case didn't convince any other projects to get rid of maintainers based on their nationality after all.
It's obviously my own opinion that what Linus did was an nonnegotiable red flag but I'd prefer to stick with it for now. I guess making this discussion political was a pretty harmful decision so I'll remove some of my replies in order to avoid creating more drama.