this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1356 readers
53 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every model they've released (after 4) has been seemingly worse than the previous.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

they're well at the top of the S-curve and now there's only desperate over-engineering and bolting on special cases left

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I still cannot believe that they couldn't special-case count 'R' in "strawberry" for their Strawberry model like what the fuck

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hell, I could probably special-case that shit, and I'm barely a programmer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Update: As a matter of fact, I did. Here's some Python code to prove it:

# Counts how many times a particular letter appears in a string.
# Very basic code, made it just to clown on the AI bubble.

appearances = int(0) # Counts how many times the selected char appears.
sentence = input("Write some shit: ")
sentence_length = len(sentence) # We need to know how long the sentence is for later
character_select = input("Select a character: ") # Your input can be as long as you wish, but only the first char will be taken

chosen_char = chr(ord(character_select[0]))

# Three-line version
for i in range (0, sentence_length):
    if chosen_char in sentence[i]:
        appearances = appearances + 1

# Two-line version (doesn't work - not sure why)
# for chosen_char in sentence:
#     appearances = appearances + 1
# (Tested using "strawberry" as sentence and "r" as character_select. Ended up getting a result of 10 ("strawberry" is 10 chars long BTW))
    
# Finally, print the fucking result
print("Your input contains "+str(appearances)+" appearances of the character ("+character_select+").")

There's probably a bug or two in this I missed, but hey, it still proves I'm more of a programmer than Sam Altman ever will be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

the for x in y statement takes iterable y and assigns a value from it to x per iteration (loop), so what happens is that it's reassigning chosen_char each loop to the next item from the sentence

(sum([x for x in sentence if x == chosen_char]) would be a quick one-liner, presuming one has downcased the sentence and other input/safety checks)

(e: this post was in response to your 2-liner comment in the code)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it is tickling me that this won’t even be GA but “selected companies”

best to keep ~~scamming the easy marks~~ “work with clients aligned to the technology you wish to deliver”, I guess

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could be. I was in the beta and honestly, I think the "guard-rails" they've had to put in truly do impact performance. Even 3.5 was better than much of what I see out of 4o

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

4o codes like 50 first dates memory style. And takes things so literally sometimes it's silly and laughable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Dude it's just kinda fucking bad. Like legitimately, the first weekend I had access to 3.5 I took the challenge of coding this complex YouTube network analysis. No problem. Like, no code just explanation. But none of the recent (anything with rails) seems to have the sharpness, where it was basically right. Even basic tasks it takes an almost worst case approach.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

I'm not sure about the down votes. But I agree it's just gotten worse for specific tasks. I've only had it shut down a task once and it was me trying to get it to do something stupid.

Work related tasks I do enjoy using it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

this isn’t autoplag fan club, and honestly if “guard rails” are the reason you think this shit is problematic it’s definitely not the place for you to be posting

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not much, what's autoplag with you!

It's short for automatic plagiarism machine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago

Lol nice.

Ah thank you.