Technology

59223 readers

3057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

165

Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article | It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review. (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article | It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.::It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The journal is: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Non-rhetorical question: Is there any journal with "Frontiers" in the name that is not a bit lawless?

To me, it implies that the journal is more "open-minded", for better or worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't have the answer to your question, but have you looked at the article? I don't think any journal would typically be publishing utter nonsense as the images in it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Not a reputable journal. Not one where science actually takes place. But there are journals for anything, including journals where the peer-review is limited to your payment.