this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
966 points (97.5% liked)

memes

9947 readers
3148 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The simplified distance rule we learn in europe is: half your speed (km/h) in meters or as an equation, v/2000. E.g. you drive 120km/h, keep 60m distance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

In France the way we learned is (for the highway at least)

  • 110km/h: 5 small markings between you and the other car
  • 130km/h: 2 large markings
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've always preferred the 2 second rule. You don't need to do distance math in your head, just find a tree and count the time it takes to get from their car to yours.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

In my country it's 3 seconds out of town and 2 seconds in town, by law. And I think that's beautiful.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the US, usually it's one car length per 10mph.

Probably not much more intuitive than yours, but less math required on the fly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tbh the math required is pretty similar, I just divide the speed by 2 and am done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's very reasonable if you're accustomed to operating in metric ... Which we all should be, but here we are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Ah, that could be interpreted at least two different ways. I have a suspicion of how this conversation will go, but I'm interested to find out.

It's my opinion that the metric system is superior to the imperial, so we should all be primarily exposed to the superior system. Some may disagree and I won't claim that I'm objectively correct. No worries if you disagree - regardless of my opinion, the imperial system is what I've been exposed to and what I use.

Alternatively, the statement might be interpreted as "you should be familiar with the metric system even if you reside in a country where it's not the primary system." That's probably less true - while it might behoove one to be familiar with the metric system, I don't blame the individual for the limitations placed on them by the government, regardless of what's better.

If you have a third interpretation, it's probably not what I meant, but I would be interested in hearing it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do European cars come with distance measuring equipment??

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Many places have roads markers every 100m. Or you can count the seconds from any fixed point and figure it out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Only in cyberpunk literature.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"In the year 2147, technology has given humans abilities beyond the natural senses, it has given them... eyes."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Eyes can't measure distance. You can only make rough estimations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

I like my distance estimates the way i like my toilet paper

rough

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I may not be good at giving it a number, but I can usually see how far apart two things are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just leave enough room to come to a stop in the gap between us.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the underlying reason to keep distance ofc. The rule of thumb gives you an easy to calculate solution to how far that approximately is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't need math for this. Once you have a feel for your car you can just visually gauge it in an instant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Judging by how close people follow me on the Interstate, I have a feeling most drivers think this but only a small percentage can do it effectively.

And judging by how close 9 out of 10 pickup truck drivers ~~follow~~ tailgate me on the interstate even when I am doing 10-15 over, I have a feeling most don't care and would prefer to run me over in their lifted Rams and SuperDutys.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Some of us don't have LIDAR-eyes, cut us some slack