this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
4302 readers
4 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You and I both know that the World Bank is especially interested in giving collective farms and other arrangements under Mao a fair shake in its assessment. Yes, the extreme poverty eradication program was a success and there were massive declines in poverty leading up to it as well, but that is fully decades after what I am talking about, when poverty was multiplied by around thirteen times as a byproduct of forcibly privatizing collectively-owned property and leaving hundreds of millions in the dust. Deng did a good job of protecting Chinese sovereignty by integrating China as a foundational element of global trade, but the "economic miracle" -- the nominal poverty reduction under the center-right, is at best a problem they only solved because they created it in the first place.
You see me around, surely you remember that I'm not some mindless China-basher, right? The fact of the matter is that Deng was a right-deviationist and that had severe consequences for the people of China, not all of which have yet been solved. We must continue to criticize revision as well as support good socialist systems and policies if we want to be any different from some mindless Chinese nationalists.
Found wisconscom's alt
nah garbageshoot is a real one, has been on hexbear for long enough without being hoxha-y
I really hope you can offer a better response than this