this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

2434 readers
1 users here now

#funny

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I had to read the second post twice to understand what it’s saying due to the non-standard grammar. But I’m a foreign speaker.

I’m asking an honest question out of curiosity: Was this easily legible to you?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the linguists call it African American Vernacular English. It's completely reasonable for you to not understand it from the outside looking in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Ain't" can be kind of difficult. It can mean "are not," "am not," "is not," "has not," or "have not." Aside from that, the statements should be separated with a period, and "it's" was used instead of "is it." Also, they use "the fuck" instead of "what the fuck."

"Ain't" is pretty common in casual speech now, and the rest is relatively common in internet speech, so it was pretty easy to read for me.

"Capitalism hasn't solved white people's poverty. What the fuck is it going to do for us?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

The main disconnect is they contracted "is it" into "it's" when "it's" is normal a posessive like that is mine, e.g. it's mine. Aka "the fuck is it going to do" or "the fuck's it going to do" would have been correct. At least I think so as a native speaker but someone with more knowledge on grammar might have more insight.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Yes, it was very clear (native speaker here). Something like this is more commonly spoken than written, so I can see why it might be confusing. If your experiencing with English is more formal (via education, reading, etc) vs talking to a whole bunch of different people, that would explain it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Was this easily legible to you?

Yes, very easily.

English doesn't have one standard grammar, but yeah this was pretty easy to understand for me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m a native English speaker and had no issue… but I come across (or hear) contractions like “ain’t” often enough that it barely registers as being non-standard… just much less formal, really. Some punctuation might’ve helped you here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

At least like one comma could have done a lot...