this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
205 points (99.5% liked)

Games

20323 readers
65 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
205
Predatory tactics in gaming are worse than you think (www.gamedeveloper.com)
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
92 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I want to shed light on a tactic that involves collecting data as you play, feeding this data into complex algorithms and models that then alter the rules of your game under the hood to optimize spending opportunities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I know how DLC works. And I disagree with your blanket opposition to all DLC ever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Horse armor was above-board, relative to this.

I keep telling you the precise shape of the problem, and you keep going 'yeah, something else.'

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm done playing your weird word games. We've been talking about a concrete example, one where you say this example is pReDaToRy simply because it involves DLC, and I take issue with you drawing that line. You can't pretend you're actually saying something else at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We’ve been talking about a concrete example, one where you say this example is pReDaToRy

I have repeatedly, specifically, and explicitly pointed out this is a lie.

You don't care.

You don't get to sneer about a word choice I've told you over and over that I did not use, in the context you're sneering about.