this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

564 readers
59 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've never seen a more pristine example of a straw man, let alone in the wild. Value is fundamental to what constitutes Marxist theory. It's like claiming Garfield hates pasta. Even beyond the strawman, I'm reminded of this quote

"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops" - Stephen Jay Gould

At which point he's going to pivot to "Capitalism lifts people out of poverty" and "it's not 0 sum" and "it's not violent, only the state is violent because starvation is a baseline" so the beauty would be wasted on him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

"it's not 0 sum"

I know it's not that important, but this really bothers me because it's not just not positive sum, entropy seems to imply that it's negative sum.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Stephen J Gould was a dipshit? Aw dang it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Is there an issue with the quote? Am I misreading?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Huh? What's dipshitty about the quote? Seems cool to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I get the sneaking suspicion that @[email protected] saw the last paragraph where I used a vague pronoun and thought the criticism was levied at Gould. Otherwise I'm willing and open to learn more about Gould.

@[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

This,

I always liked that quote from Gould, was afraid he nullified it with capitalist diarrhea propaganda

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Yeah probably something like that