this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
671 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

5429 readers
1390 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Cheap and not exploiting people and environment unfortunately don't go hand to hand. You have to choose your priority.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

How do you think your food gets to your table?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Cheap" is relative, stop being deliberately obtuse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They actually do go hand in hand. Just not under the american economic system. China has cheap evs higher average wages when factoring in ppp, and a better environmental track record and future than the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They actually do go hand in hand.

they actually do not. whatever your business is, you can do it with or without passing negative externalities on your employees and environment you operate in.

in one case your product will be cheaper, but with bad consequences, and you have to choose one of these paths.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Easy to do when you skip 200 years of industrialization. I get what you're saying, and you're not wrong, but they just happened to be in a more advantageous position to start with in this instance.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

"skip"? Not strong on history are you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh yes, the famously non exploitative economy of China. The country where some companies are installing fences on the roofs so that their working forces can't suicide so easily. The country were political prisoners are being used as cheap working force. That one? Doesn't sound so much better or even different from the American economic system.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The country where some companies are installing fences on the roofs so that their working forces can't suicide so easily.

The specific company you're likely thinking of is famously American company Apple.

Or rather a legally distinct subcontractor that does nothing but produce products for Apple and is thus de facto a part of Apple regardless of legal ass-covering.

The country were political prisoners are being used as cheap working force

As opposed to the US where more or less ALL prisoners, some of which are political prisoners, are slaves?

In case there's any doubt, none of what I just pointed out exhonorates Chinese mistreatment of workers in any way.

Equally horrible or even less horrible doesn't ever equal good enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, that is exactly why I wrote that it's not so different from the American system

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oops, guess I missed that part, my apologies. In my defense, it was late here 😁

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Did you step out of a time machine from the early 2000s? Also that second part just isn't a thing in China. Id recommend actually reading up on modern China, what they did to the foxxcon ceos that did cause suicide inducing working conditions, and why China will surpass the US in every positive measure by the end of the decade