politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Ex-Presidents don't endorse future politicians. They step aside for new leadership.
You just write down whatever you make up in your head as if it were a fact, or what?
I've studied political science, economics, and history for ten years. Most don't have the time and resources. My mistake was engaging the echo chamber with something so complicated.
And the proof several others posted about former presidents endorsing candidates, including George W. Bush doesn't mean anything because you are the authority here?
Maybe presidents shouldn't endorse, but not everything is as it should, because you said so. And just because it shouldn't you can't just say it isn't, as if it were a fact.
Reagan changed many paradigms for the worse. I'd bet the majority here couldn't name his predecessor without looking it up, let alone the legislative majorities and legislation.
I'm going to go do something more productive.
Yeah, man. This crowd doesn't really care about the point you were trying to make. Lemmy just wants to vote their feelings.
Don't sweat it.
Your lack of care (and history of shallow reasoning and arrogance) is why everything increasingly sucks.
This crowd isn't representative of Lemmy whole.
A. I was commiserating with you.
B. Not sure where you are coming from with that weird judgment about my shallow reasoning and arrogance, lol.
C. Cheers mate. Maybe you should take a break.
insert Skinner meme here
"It must be everyone else that's wrong."
It's not actually that complicated. Every living former president, including the one the article is about, has made endorsements either in this or a previous election.
Obama and Biden? And Harris?
Bush endorsed Romney in 2012.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/george-w-bush-endorses-mitt-romney/2012/05/15/gIQAZXLMSU_story.html
Bush also endorsed McCain in 2008
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us-politics/bush-endorses-mccain-for-presidency-idUSWAT009073/
He also endorsed a bunch of non-presidential political candidates.
Yeah, the dignity of the office took quite a nose dive at Reagan.
Yet 4 former presidents endorsed Harris. So what are you on about?
They're wrong to do so. It's an old tradition intended to ensure peaceful transfer of power and avoid hegemony. They disrespect the office.
A tradition like president candidates releasing tax returns or presidents making White House visitor logs public or staying out of justice department actions or not personally profiting off the presidency or...
Yes. Much of the precedent that constitutes a "good" President was established by the actions of Washington and Adams.
Username checks out
An endorsement disrespects the office, but Trump shitting all over the office, and every citizen isn't. Yeah you can fuck right off with your disingenuous bullshit.
I expect and deserve better. It's not a popular perspective here, where all have settled for "not Trump". I'll leave you to your less than mediocre whatever.
Can't not read that in Comic Book Guy's voice.
Ironic. And the third-party candidates aren't?
Sure, go ahead and try to execute the VP, overturn election results, completely stonewall judicial appointments, but actually calling out a traitor is a bridge too far.
Because Trump is a pig, all the rest should roll in the mud also? That doesn't seem wise.