this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
657 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3344 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (8 children)

You'd be surprised how many private schools receive federal funding.

But honestly this isn't the worst thing. As long as it's interacted with in an honest manner the ASVAB is an excellent career test. So an honest interaction with it would be counselors telling students their results and showing them career paths that line up with those results. To be clear, we're talking about civilian career paths.

The problem is I don't hear about it being done that way anymore. (My highschool did exactly the above) I only hear about it being used by recruiters, for recruiting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When I took my asvab I was surprised when they told me my mechanical aptitude was really good...didn't know a Phillips from a flat head but wound up as an aircraft mechanic which was fuckin dope!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Having the right paperworks and acting on said paperwork are two unrelated things in the military.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh God, I was an idiot. My recruiter said I qualified for everything. I told him I wanted to be an Airborne Infantryman. He repeated, Everything, could write my own ticket. So I decided... To double down on an Airborne School and Infantry contract. If I could go back in time I'd give that man a beer, slap myself, and forge my own signature on a military intelligence analyst contract. I'd have loved that job, learning languages, embassy postings (travel), and being all up in everyone's tea. But no 17 year old Maggoty had to be a dumbass.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'd have loved that job, learning languages,

Former linguist here... I'd recommend not joining as a linguist on your first enlistment. Go in on something simple: admin, truck driver, something with a short tech school. Then re-enlist as a linguist.

For prior service students in a Cat IV language, Monterey is pretty much a ~2 year, paid vacation. You'll have free time to attend college classes, take a part time job, or something else that will benefit you in the long run.

For initial entry students, it's a 2-year, officially condoned and mandated hazing ritual.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lmao, I have similar story but it actually worked out in the end for me. When I signed up for the Air Force I did really well on my ASVAB, but I told my recruiter that I wanted to leave as soon as possible because I just wanted to go already. Well she signed me up for open general, meaning the AF would pick my job for me. So I left for boot camp with no job and was assigned Cyber Security Analyst. Which was super lucky because I could have also been a cook or a cop or something

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If it's to see where you fit, they will put you where you fit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Dude, you were kissed by Murphy.

load more comments (5 replies)