this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
593 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Something like 2% of the population thinks that Gaza is a big problem for America.

Not actually true. You'll see a 3-5% swing in the polls based on how closely Republicans and Democrats are aligned on supporting the Israeli genocide.

Stop acting like you’re living in a country on the verge of a Socialist revolution.

When you listen to Trump talk, a big part of his platform is appealing to the (whites only) democratic socialism common to the 50s and 60s. When Kamala panders to her base, she talks about cutting the private cost of health care and education. I'm not sure where you got the idea of a pending Socialist Revolution. But socialist policy is consistently appealing across large majorities of the American voting base.

Younger people want to enroll in Medicare sooner. Older people love Social Security. Parents clamor for public education. Students flock to public universities and scramble over one another for public educational grants. The whole east coast loves Amtrak, particularly when compared to prospect of being crammed aboard some Boeing To Die sardine can. People generally like having a post office and a garbage collection service.

Obama barely got the ACA passed when he had a veto proof majority.

Because the insurance lobbyists in the US Senate worked overtime to kill it. Not because people hated the idea of increased Medicaid enrollment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nothing you wrote disproves my main point.

Harris is as good as we're going to get, and it's by no means assured that she'll win.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Harris is as good as we’re going to get

If that doesn't benefit people in redder states, how will it motivate them to turn out in support?

"Sorry, fuckwits, should have moved to California if you didn't want to die of sepsis" isn't an invigorating national policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you go into the Red states and proclaim your candidate is a Socialist you'll bring in many, many more Red voters. In fact, calling a candidate Socialist is probably a great way to get some of their voters shot.

So what exactly is your great plan?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

calling a candidate Socialist is probably a great way to get some of their voters shot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Control_Act_of_1954

Still officially on the books.

But this reflects an imbalance of power, rather than popularity. Yes, you can run as a socialist. Yes, you can build up a large movement of enthusiastic participants. Yes, you can march through the streets on your way to the voting booth.

And then what happens... Just a little recreational fentanyl followed by lighting my car on fire. Normal stuff. Happens all the time. Or maybe I find a 6-foot python in my car. shrug

So what exactly is your great plan?

Obviously, just keep voting for the person the TV tells me to vote for and keep my head down until I die of old age.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Obviously, just keep voting for the person the TV tells me to vote for and keep my head down until I die of old age.

You remind me of that Ben Franklin quote.

Many men die at twenty five, but aren't buried for another sixty years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Benjamin Lay would have rolled his eyes at that one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Your comment is both obscure and pointless.