this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
658 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59192 readers
2513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 191 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

If Microsoft had actually moved all the settings over to the "new" settings app (it's 12 years old, btw), I'd be supportive of this.

It's a joke that windows has 2 settings apps, and searching for specific settings in the start menu will take you to either, or to both.

But as we all know, Microsoft won't do this properly. They'll likely just continue with their 75% finished settings app while hiding the control panel, and if you need something not in the settings app you'll have to open some old menu using a run command or some other terrible convoluted step that makes you feel like you're running a half-baked Linux distro from 2003.

MacOS, Android, iOS, Linux distros don't have this issue. Fucking TempleOS doesn't have this issue. Microsoft is a $3.2 trillion company!

The absolute lack of effort they put into Windows is pathetic. They're a shining example of why monopolies should not be allowed to happen.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

the thing that most grinds my gears is that there are settings that appear in both control panels and settings, appear to be changeable in both, but only one or the other actually changes anything.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

I hate the settings app so much that I've just learned the powershell commands for setting up printers and changing NIC settings. Honestly it wouldn't be as bad if a. It didn't take forever to load on occasion and b. I could have two settings windows open at once.

It's so hard to find settings there that jumping between network center and add device is not intuitive. If they remove control panel from servers too I might quite my msp job and go work at a grocery store.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Does Linux have good support for VR yet? Specifically my HP Reverb g2 that seems to be reliant on windows mixed reality...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Just a curious question - Is there any VR sets that work with Linux Distros? I'm not much of a gamer to need or want one. Just want to learn for learning's sake.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have the same headset, and as of a few weeks ago when I last checked, there is not complete support. I think the display works mostly, but the controllers don't so it might depend on what you are doing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Interesting - I rarely use the controllers, so could be do-able at least as a dual boot

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I've never tried VR on any OS, but from what I've heard it's hit and miss on Linux right now - certainly not as good as Windows at the moment.

I know that KDE has a lot of stuff for VR (unsurprising given Valve is pushing for it), and Gnome has just merged a lot of the same, so if you give it a spin I'd recommend an up-to-date distro (say Fedora or OpenSUSE Tumbleweed) with either KDE or Gnome.

I imagine that when Valve releases their new headset, progress will accelerate, but that's just a guess

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, thank you

Also was unaware Valve was working on a new headset! That's good news as it feels like the market has really stagnated outside of the Meta headsets.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't get too excited. Supposedly the next headset is internally called Deckard, and it's been "about to release" for like 3 years now? Pretty much everything people think they know about it is conjecture based off code Valve has tucked away in SteamVR; zero public statements of intent.

As for VR on Linux... kinda? I've only read terrible things about it online. I have an Index and tried to use it with Mint a few months back, and while it mostly worked without any configuration issues, there was a weird white ring around the edge of the screen that I couldn't figure out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

zero public statements of intent

To be fair, when has Valve ever done this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

About as often as they actually release anything