this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Progressive Politics

2956 readers
123 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But it doesn't have to be the same group in the population. Probably a portion is the same but the larger picture is all those you help up again so they can help support the community/country/state, and the price is helping the group that otherwise make the community unsafe so they in large can ... act decently to others and live a life without violence

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

helping the group that otherwise make the community unsafe

Why does such a group have to exist?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

non offending pedophiles are a classic example of a group that makes others unsafe. and removing them would be mass murder of innocent people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

If they can settle in their own town, there is no threat and they don't need welfare. An example where initial assistance is needed but no continuous welfare.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

In a perfect world they wouldn't. But its hard to ensure that everyone gets a traumatic free childhood, or that any natural insedent traumatise some people to the point where they cant/won't be helped. I guess the downvotes is because your comment feels too unrealistic idealistic (otherwise I can't see why)