Games

32473 readers

1149 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-36

Is 4gb vram enough to run read dead redemtion 2? (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm planning to buy pc with rx 470 4gb and i5 3470, will I be able to rdr2 at least at low settings in 1080p 30 fps?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Mods please ban this clown.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I agree that OP could make more structured and elaborate threads, but I wouldn't call him a clown or spammer for that much.
Might I remind you that you can just ignore him if you don't want to see his threads? Like that those who wish to engage on those threads still can and you won't be bothered anymore.

If OP break a community rule or a site wide rule, we will ban him, after warning him, but not otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I didn't think a mod would actually see that comment haha. I'm impressed though!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But perhaps a good community rule would be to make threads that are conducive to discussion rather than single answers that can be found with a quick web search.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Anything "easily googleable" should be removed on site.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do agree. I'll raise the question with the others mods and we'll decide on a new rule if necessary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know how to properly word this, and I hope you don't take it in a negative way. Is this not something you would want the entire communities opinion on? Just you and the mods going to decide what we want?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think this would be a first. So there is no real methodology in place right now.
But I'd really like to get the community involved for the decision making, that's something we'll discuss internally, but in my opinion I'd like for it to work as following :

The community, LW admin, or the mods express the need for new rules <- We are here
Internal discussion between mods, and, if needed, LW admins, to make sure the new or updated rule is conform to LW rules and what we wish to do with the community.
Once the draft of the new rule is done, we'd publish it as draft to get feedback.
Once most people agree on the new or updated rule, we will start enforce it, first with a bit of leniency, then more strictly.

What do you think about that ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That works for me. I really appreciate the transparency

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

After ops reply to this, i agree

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think a warning and a rule against spam would suffice for now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what did he do?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Read the other comment.