Asklemmy

43790 readers

885 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you have a form of government you invented/conceived, either as an idea or for fiction (or a favorite from someone else)? How does it work? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As kids, we're told only people who go to college/university for politics/economics/law are qualifiable to make/run a country. As adults, we see no nation these "qualified" adults form actually work as a nation, with all manifesto-driven governments failing. Which to me validates the ambitions of all political theorist amateurs, especially as there are higher hopes now that anything an amateur might throw at the wall can stick. Here's my favorite from a friend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This sounds cool. Why not make it 150 people per group max, since we can only have roughly 150 good human connections at any given time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I originally did, but on further reading I found that dunbar's number isn't strictly proven, though it does feel about right.

Also, you would get super tiny towns and the community wouldn't be diverse enough to support multiple interest groups. For example, assuming a small niche knitting community in a village of 150 would have maybe 3 members who would already know everything about each other, whereas in a town of 5000, there'd be a higher chance of getting at least a mixed bag of people who only know each other through the knitting group.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Very good point, it might lead to more tribalism if kept too small

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

exactly, though some small degree of tribalism is wanted (e.g. a community of tech-heads, or a community of hippies, or a community of furries, etc.)