this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
151 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She’s far closer to the right side of history than Biden.

So which of her policies regarding Israel differs from his?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The Palestinian one. Do the research on her private conversation with Netanyahu

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How can you do research on a private conversation? Did they write it down?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The press reported on it. It was separate from her Biden Bibi meeting

Troll elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

All we know about Harris’s conversation with Netayahu is what Harris herself said to the press after the meeting, and she didn’t say anything different from what Biden has said.

And she wasn’t in the meeting where Biden met with Netanyahu.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it's private then how can we research it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was reported on.

Use a search engine. This thread started with an assertion she's the same. That's the assertion to prove.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it was a private conversion then how can a reporter know it's true?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If a concern troll falls in the forest and no one is there to observe it, are they still concerned?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the conversation was actually private then a reporter wouldn't know about it

But, assuming such conversation happened, what actions and results have come from it?

Israel continues to kill children in Gaza without consequence. Netanyahu arrived in the US and was applauded in Congress by (nearly) everyone present (in both parties).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

She's the VP. Other than words, there's not a lot she even can do.

That's where this lot of concerned people will always "be right" until she actually has power. And all this concern appears targeted to undermine that very outcome.

Even if she went full public and said all support would be withdrawn, it wouldn't be enough because people would want it now.

But she's not even elected let alone president.

Did you see what it took to get Biden to drop from the race? He's even more serious about Israel, I think.

There is no "winning" against this new raking of insisting she act as president and I do something. She can't.

Yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So she's totally doing the right thing behind the scenes?

Yeah, I hear that plenty about Biden.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That's what they've said from the beginning of this whole mess. Then they've sat back and let Israel do whatever the fuck they want

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Doing the right thing behind the scenes is the kind of action that lead to the Russian hostage exchange, the satisfaction of the rail worker unions after the railroad strike, the steady increase in student loan relief after SCOTUS shut down the blanket 10k handouts, and the duping of republicans into getting the chips act passed.

I personally believe in their capacity to do the right thing behind the scenes, just like I believe in the other side’s capacity to do the wrong thing behind the scenes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Biden's administration has done NOTHING useful for Gazans

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

People who are fine with genocide have no reason to distrust Biden, and no need to see actual daylight between him and Harris. He's already doing everything centrists want in public.

And I asked which of her policies differs from Biden's. Policies are publicly held. Not "Trust me bro it's totally opposite day behind the scenes."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

"He wants to fix it but he has no leverage"

That's their fallback "argument"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And I asked which of her policies differs from Biden's

I was addressing the comment “I hear that plenty about Biden” and pointing out that the Biden administration has taken action behind the scenes, at least on a number of other issues.

I also have reason to believe that whatever behind-the-scenes talks are happening concerning Israel are pro-preace, because otherwise the US would be throwing enough military weight behind Israel that Palestine would be finished by now.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

What action has the administration taken? Israel is still killing children in Gaza

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nevertheless, there's no difference in public policy, and "trust me bro" is not an answer to "how do they differ?" because "trust me bro" was the answer when people were upset at Biden for his unconditional support for Netanyahu's genocide.

I do not trust Biden, and I do not trust his acolytes when they tell me to trust anyone else. Because his acolytes were all in on genocide and still are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

his unconditional support for Netanyahu's genocide

Biden has not given any “unconditional support for Netanyahu’s genocide”, because again, if that were the case, then Netanyahu’s mission would be over by now

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sitting around and doing nothing (but providing weapons and cash) while Israel kills children looks like unconditional support to me

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Netanyahu's mission is to stay in power. Ordering Biden to buy him a genocide is how he's doing that. I'm not sorry it isn't happening faster, though you seem to be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I literally laughed out loud. Accusing me of being in favor of genocide, and a faster one at that, is a pretty weird and insane interpretation of everything I’ve said.

I believe that a Harris presidency would be better for Gaza than a Trump presidency. That’s the motivation behind everything I’ve said.

But if you don’t agree with me? Fine. You’re entitled to your own opinion. I just hope you don’t accuse everyone who disagrees with you of being in favor of genocide against any people. That’s bad for the soul.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I believe that a Harris presidency would be better for Gaza than a Trump presidency. That’s the motivation behind everything I’ve said.

I'd like evidence that her policies differ in any way from Biden's.

"Behind the scenes, now shut up" ain't that.