this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
687 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3204 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I disagree with you and I'm done with this conversation. You haven't backed up any of your claims.

Edit: Hopefully you won't ban me for my opinions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

LOL - you need evidence that someone shitting on the sidewalk like a dog is making good life choices?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, I need evidence on your claim that less fortunate people forfeit their right to decide for themselves.

Your elitism is showing.

You're a lost case. For everyone else reading: we cannot expect that people who for some reason or another got into a financial or mental health mess, are the ones who can get themselves out of it without help. Suppose a drunk person falls into a pond and can't get out. And then you say "well, SERVES YOU RIGHT for getting drunk. You get out of the lake yourself!" Who- who? The hell thinks like that?!

A person who's top priority is "shit, what will I eat tomorrow? Will I be safe tonight?" should be helped by those like us, the one with the access, knowledge and resources. They should not be victim-blamed.

It's kinda weird when people are not empathetic to those in need, when you think about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They aren't simply "less fortunate". They lack the ability to properly care for themselves or establish a stable environment in which to live.

If they're going to burden society with their issues, they have no right to complain when society resolves their issues for them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, you've been repeating the same thing for the past 5 or 6 comments.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup, because their deplorable state is self evident.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you're just trolling at this point. Are you doing this for the lulz? Yeah, you're doing this for the lulz.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Nope, just reporting on the state of the homeless in my town.

Things will start getting better once drugs are re-criminalized starting next month.