Valery Zaluzhny has been blamed for the failure of the 2023 summer counteroffensive
General Valery Zaluzhny was dismissed as the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian armed forces partly because he had clashed with the Pentagon about how to conduct the counteroffensive against Russia last summer, Politico EU reported on Friday.
President Vladimir Zelensky sacked Zaluzhny on Thursday, even as the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) warned this might trigger riots or a mutiny. General Aleksandr Syrsky has since been announced as Zaluzhny’s replacement.
Officially, the US has neither supported nor opposed Zaluzhny’s firing, with National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan telling the media last weekend that “we’re just not going to get embroiled in that particular decision.”
Unofficially, Zaluzhny was blamed for the Ukrainian disagreements with the Pentagon during the 2023 counteroffensive, a source who has “advised the White House on military matters” told Politico.
British and American generals helped plan and wargame Ukraine’s big offensive push to the Azov Sea, but Zaluzhny “tossed aside” the plan after just four days of brutal fighting and opted for tactics the Ukrainians were more familiar with, according to a Washington Post postmortem published in December.
[...]
(non-archived full source: https://www.rt.com/russia/592204-zaluzhny-pentagon-criticism-offensive/ )
And in contrary reports: Nuland told Zelensky not to fire top general – The Times
Stuff like this gets published but libs still think Ukraine is sovereign.
I'm also kind of surprised that the US would push to get rid of an apparently total neo-Nazi general, but I guess there is a limit to the mistakes they'll allow even from their fascist friends.
They also specifically and by name blamed him for the Nordstream bombing, i'm kinda surprised they got rid of him now, instead of waiting more, seems too early to sacrifice a scapegoat (unless they do want to start asking for peace, but that seems unlikely).
They probably just need some positive results to keep justifying all the spending the Biden regime still wants to go to Ukraine. It's election season in the imperialist heartland, and he's running as a war president so the war has got to be going well for him to have a chance.
either they pin the blame on him or they have to admit their precious NATO doctrine is dogshit and doesnt work.
Aren't they kind of admitting that anyway by letting a guy who learned Soviet doctrine take over?
It's only an admission if their audience understands that. Libs don't know or care to know that the replacement will use Soviet doctrine instead of NATO doctrine. At best, it'll be spun as a "Syrsky knows how the enemy thinks" type of angle. People who aren't drowning in the propaganda and copium can see who's winning the war and whose doctrine is working just fine. The types of people who need convincing are so deluded they won't be able to see the change as an admission; they'll see it as proof of Ukraine's genius adaptability or some such nonsense.