this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science

4825 readers
3 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This "study" doesn't seem to provide anything other than a correlation between WFD and cognitive decline. Sample size also seemed low? (125 adults)

Now, if somebody regularly struggles to recall the word they want to use, I don't argue that "could" indicate cognitive decline. However, it seems far from being a "clear indication".

Anybody with knowledge in related fields who wants to tackle reading the full published article, I'd be keen to hear your thoughts! But really seems like the linked article overplays the results for dramatic effect...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Near the bottom of this article it mentions that WFD isn’t the thing, but instead reaction time. Either way this does require an expert opinion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Reaction time in what sense? I read some of it, and it states that slower reactions are part of the normal ageing process as well!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

That sounds like an important distinction; I appreciate it.

I am kinda assuming the actual study has valid use; I think I probably just found the way it was described off-putting.

But yeah, expert opinion would definitely help here. Oh well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯