politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It would have been clearer to say "I nearly lost my mother to the sort of poison that is now coming across our border," but he's recording an ad and he needs to be concise. I would agree that he was being misleading if he was trying to use his mother's addition as evidence that opiates are being smuggled from Mexico, but he isn't. (It is a widely acknowledged fact that a lot of opiates are smuggled in from Mexico.) Therefore even if some listeners do assume that his mother was addicted specifically to Mexican opiates, that doesn't substantially affect their understanding of what he's saying.
Its not widely accepted..back when his mother was addicted to opiates it was likely "China white" in that area of the country; likely imported from the middle east / asia. Heroin coming from mexico has historically been the "black tar" variety.
Thats if she was taking heroin. If it was Rx opiates she didn't need to go further than her pain doctor back then. The rules have changed a lot over the years but 10 years ago she would have been able to get those filled by her provider.
It was Rx opiates, ones she was stealing from her patients.
Thanks for context, I could not be bothered to research anything about this guy. Glad his mom found recovery but the specifics here make it even more ridiculous how he is tying his moms substance use issues to the proverbial boogeymen south of the border.
Why are you defending a fascist liar who intentionally lied? Lol like adding a word was too much, he just didn't have time!
You are going to get all sorts of shit defending a liar. One can only guess why you're doing it. Hmmm, I wonder
What, am I a Russian agent? A Republican? JD Vance himself?
You didn't answer the question. Why are you defending an extremely obvious intentional lie?
*crickets chirping*
It would have been clearer. But he didn't word it that way. He worded it VERY VERY specifically to direct racial hatred at "dirty druggie Mexicans" using the most textbook of textbook definitions of lying.
Take them at face value when they are explicitly saying what they mean. This guy is a raging racist prick.
Then you shouldn't have any trouble providing a citation or two? Otherwise, this is as weak as it gets...
Here's an excerpt from what the DEA is saying:
Source. Warning, it's a long PDF.
I'm sorry, I don't see opiates mentioned. Also, DEA is a questionable source at best. Their job is to create the war on drugs, not end it
This is Biden's DEA and if you check the pdf, you'll see that they're talking specifically about fentanyl.
Oh, my bad, I forgot Biden started the DEA, and no, I'm not going to be fucked to read it
Are you auditioning for the Olympic Mental Gymnastics team or something? He lied. The end.
Yes it would’ve been clearer but that’s not what he said, he almost lost her to the poison that IS coming over the border (emphasis is mine). That is a lie.