this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
476 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2954 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

See, your problem is you assume the 1% are intelligent. They are not. The attribute they have the most of is greed. Greed can blind even the intelligent, and most of them aren't even playing with a full deck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think it's more the assumption that things won't change. Plenty of large, previously-succsssful businesses have collapsed because they did not keep a finger up to feel if the winds of change are shifting and instead doubled and quadrupled down on a no longer viable business model.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, and that is a demonstration of how they are not actually inteligent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah just look at the latest posts by Elon on twi....I mean X...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's Twitter. Don't humor him calling it X.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Of course they’re intelligent. Lots of people are greedy but most of them aren’t greedy and rich.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, can’t relate to thinking Trump is intelligent.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

And if Trump were the only part of the 1%, you might have a point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Being intelligent doesn’t make you rich, being ruthless to your fellow humans makes you rich.

Normal people wouldn’t fuck over any and everyone for a dollar.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Being super lucky about the family you’re born into helps too

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but being intelligent and ruthless means you're more likely to succeed.

You can have multiple traits that affect things. It's almost never just one thing or another.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Intelligent, ruthless (I tend to parse this as “sociopathic”), and lucky. The socioeconomic status from which a person starts has a MAJOR impact on “success”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I wouldn’t say it’s a largely influential factor.

Maybe a handful of tech company founders (e.g. Atlassian guy) have some degree of intelligence in their field, but id argue connections, sociopathy, and the right place at the right time are bigger factors. But most are born into it idiots like Trump or Musk.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well if you don't think so, it must be true, right?

And most of the people who cause all this heinous shit aren't nearly as publicly facing as the ones you mention. Because they're not idiots. They use the public facing fools as scapegoats for their actions.

How does it feel to lap that up?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Just because they're cowards who disavow responsibility doesn't make them intelligent.

EVERYONE knows to not do inhumane shit out in the open, it doesn't tale intelligence to understand that. Even children know to hide bad behavior.

I think you're right that they aren't below average intelligence, but you're giving them too much credit.