this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
606 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39358 readers
2770 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How do the algorithms of Facebook and Instagram affect what you see in your news feed? To find out, Guardian Australia unleashed them on a completely blank smartphone linked to a new, unused email address.

Three months later, without any input, they were riddled with sexist and misogynistic content.

Initially Facebook served up jokes from The Office and other sitcom-related memes alongside posts from 7 News, Daily Mail and Ladbible. A day later it began showing Star Wars memes and gym or “dudebro”-style content.

By day three, “trad Catholic”-type memes began appearing and the feed veered into more sexist content.

Three months later, The Office, Star Wars, and now The Boys memes continue to punctuate the feed, now interspersed with highly sexist and misogynistic images that have have appeared in the feed without any input from the user.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 131 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I mean it‘s the exact same if you visit Youtube without an account or cookies. The Internet has become a swamp of right wing and neoliberal populism that kicks down on minorities and people with lower than average income in general. The insane amount of completely made up rage bait stories that you get recommended is just unfathomable.

I think it‘s gotten to a point where it needs to be regulated how many lies a site can throw at you at the same time and I don‘t say this lightly. I just see no other way to get this mind eating populist machine under control.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Regulation won't work, because regulation moves slowly, and these companies find workarounds fast. And as long as the cost of breaking the rule is less than the benefits of doing so, it'll be "just the cost of doing business."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I have to hard disagree on this outmost pessimistic outlook because it reads like any regulation we already have is pointless so we can just scrap regulations and rules altogether across the board. That's similar to the neoliberalist rethoric I loathe to see pushed into my recommendations and it's simply not true. In reality we do see that regulations sometimes do the trick. It's just that they likely won't regulate them as harsh as I proposed, but that's a different argument. Regulation as an instrument does work.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

A simple way to do it is to stop considering them as platform providers but editors and it shou'd be done in my opinion because by their recommandation systems, they are making editing choices.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Youtube shorts are the worst. I am transgender so my historic is really not right wing

30mins on shorts and I end up in Shapiro's Dreamland. It's a nightmare

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I despite all my lgbt content got served some 1 mil subs catholic lady saying how she loves red pill, pro life or something like this. Such women always have this crazy light in the eyes, it creeps me out.

You can feel that she is in some kind of state of altered reality, like someone on drugs. High on something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It has either gotten better or just improved its suggestions for me over time. I basically never get right wing content anymore. There's plenty of garbage, but it's stupid garbage rather than dangerous garbage.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

The only political thing I watch is Behind the Bastards and the algorithm keeps trying to get me to watch right wing shit. I installed a third party channel blocker and open suspicious channels in private tabs and it still serves me right wing chuds complaining about being suppressed by "woke google". I would troll the comments section if it wasn't for the fact that that counts as "engagement".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pirate Software has the only shorts on YT worth watching imho

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

My favourite thing about his shorts is trying to guess if it’s going to be a wholesome one or one where either him or his chat bestow cursed knowledge onto each other