this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024

165 points (98.8% liked)

Open Source

30983 readers

473 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

165

NewPipe v0.27.0 No longer Working? [Update] (infosec.pub)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Has NewPipe v0.27.0 stopped working for anyone else? It won't play anymore. It loads the video page and comments, but throws an error when attempting to play or download the video. I've submitted an error report, but was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this.

Edit: thank you, everyone! I figured it was google being a giant turd again, but want sure, since it worked perfectly fine for me yesterday, and I didn't see anything pop up on Lemmy yet. I understand the logistical and costing nightmare of this, but we really need a FOSS decentralized video sharing platform to take hold and take off. Let google and other bigturdtech die where they made their beds.

Update: newpipe 0.27.1 was just released, which fixes this deliberately google-caused issue. As I understand, some other frontends implemented their own fixes, too. These teams are amazing!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

Yo! Grayjay still works!

https://grayjay.app/

Edit: I didn't realize people were so sensitive about alternative options. I'm not a NewPipe developer, so I can't fix it, but I have confirmed that as of right now it isn't working.

Use whatever app works for you, IDGAF

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't have any opinion on grayjay but this is the open source community and grayjay is proprietary. That's the only reason I downvoted your comment

Feel free to use it if it works for you but I think it's poor form to advertise proprietary products in a thread about a free software project.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Their source code is available online silly. You can recompile it however you want, you just can't redistribute it.

https://github.com/futo-org/grayjay-android

Edit: They also now have an F-Droid repository.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@over_clox Which means it's not open-source, silly, because open-source explicitly means you can redistribute it.

[+] [email protected] -6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh bitch bitch. So what? Is your only interest in taking their code and trying to profit from it?

Fucking hell, folks told me it would never show up on F-Droid for such nitpicky terms, but they got their own repository now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@over_clox The lack of redistribution is what's causing projects to disappear and die, vendor lock-in, walled gardens, bricked devices.. you clearly have no idea what you are talking about

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm just gonna drop this link here, make of it and FUTO in general whatever you will. They actually are privacy centric..

https://youtube.com/live/OJPmbcU-Vzo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"Privacy centric" is irrelevant because because this is the free software movement, not the privacy movement (also, this is not reddit, we have a higher standard of conduct here).

Further reading on free software philosophy. Most relevant is why software should not have owners (1994) as this is fundamentally where FUTO disagrees with the open source/free software movement.

I also made a prior comment here about the fundamental difference between "fauxpen source" licenses like FUTO's and real FOSS licenses. You seem to characterize it as "stealing code and profiting off it" but the strength of free software is in collaboration and community, not so much competition, so sharing is considered a virtue here. I talked more about it here in a reddit comment referencing my previous lemmy comment.

This will probably be my last comment on FUTO/Grayjay in this thread, since I've said all I intend to say several times here and on reddit. I might make a master post about the problems of fauxpen source at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Interesting to learn some finer grained details of the scene.

I do actually have my own graphics software projects like halfway open source, but I could only bring myself to share the backend color coding algorithms.

I can't bring myself to share the frontend GUI code, as it has to work around many bugs of the language its coded in (RapidQ), and I really ain't got time to try to explain all the weird fixes to make it work mostly right.

Anyways, the last version of my project was Color Painter 1.5B

https://tinyurl.com/colorpainter15b

I have my own simple license that basically says have fun, do whatever you want, but only for free private personal usage.

But that was back in 2017, I had no idea that AI systems were about to take over the scene.

So now I'm like fuckit.

I just don't share the GUI code because I had to pull so many jankery tricks that nobody would really understand, partly to fix bugs in the language and partly to remap keyboard shortcuts.

These days, it hardly matters. If you're interested in my old project, just hit me up.

I'm all about free software, but I have my reasons for not tending to share all my code to everyone. It's rather confusing.

load more comments (8 replies)