this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
106 points (100.0% liked)
Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'
973 readers
188 users here now
Rules:
-
News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.
-
Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.
-
Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.
-
Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.
Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.
Communities We Like:
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Don't use biometrics. Period.
Biometrics are not inherently bad, it's usually just a shortcut your device uses to enter your passcode for you after the initial entry when you turn on your device, the actual decryption still requires your passcode. As long as you actually understand how it works on your devices and how to disable it if you're likely to deal with groups like law enforcement.
Like your phone's Lockdown mode:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/105120
https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-use-the-android-lockdown-mode-and-why-you-should/
Police can legally force you to unlock your phone via biometrics.
Isn't this because the conditions of his parole required him to provide this?
That was part of it:
He refused, which did violate his parole.
It's the last bit that is the important part. That is not part of the conditions of the parole. And that is what the court found was not a rights violation.