this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1432 readers
16 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean they come up to ChatGPT on v3.5 (or Bard lmao) and expect it to write comedy?

Yeah, these things are supposed to be good at writing, aren't they?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Define "good at writing". Good comedy is very difficult to attain and none of the models are anywhere near it, including the more recent ones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Define “good at writing”.

I don't want to.

Good comedy is very difficult to attain and none of the models are anywhere near it, including the more recent ones.

I concur.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

a true conversationalist lmao you're doing great buddy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Dunno what you want me to say. Define the vague concept of "good writing"?

The linked study finds that ChatGPT 3.5 and Bard suck at writing comedy. You claim in so many words that this should be obvious (along with a really dubious claim that machines can't tickle people for some reason). I'm also not surprised that these models are terrible at writing comedy, because even at best of times I find their output bland, trite and crudely stripped of anything potentially divisive.

However, lots of people seem to think that LLMs are good at writing related tasks, so I don't think it's inherently obvious that these tools suck at writing comedy in particular.

All these words make this reply much less fun to write.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

oh, you were looking for the lmao conversations room? you missed the turn: it’s the last door inside clown school. you’re not even in the right building atm!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

hey you're the creepy guy who reads comment history before replying to a conversation aren't you ?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I thought the point of posting your ideas on a public forum was to have people read them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

nah, there’s nothing creepier than giving some shithead the common courtesy of checking their post history to see if they’re somehow like this all the time or if they’re just having a particularly bad night

gonna be honest, I didn’t give this one that common courtesy cause once they get to the stage where they creepjacket other posters for looking at their previous terrible posts, whatever Reddit has done to their brain is severe and irreversible

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

it's always the ones with a veritable comet tail of receipts

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

the esteemed poster huffed and puffed at least twice more on their local, which we blessedly don't have to see

such a hilariously pathetic bit of darvo, too. fuckin dipshits.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I didn't even press Next Page! dire

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

this isn't Oprah Ft Holographic Dr Phil, stop projecting

I merely looked after you went 3 for 3 on idiotic posts

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

oh yeah silly me. That's definitely not creepy 👍

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

you can’t even sign off on your shitty posts to the degree that you’re now pretending it’s creepy to click a link and take a 5 minute scroll through your bullshit

it’s time for you and your shitty posts to leave