Firefox on Debian stable is so old that websites yell at you to upgrade to a newer browser. And last time I tried installing Debian testing (or was it debian unstable?), the installer shat itself trying to make the bootloader. After I got it to boot, apt refused to work because of a missing symlink to busybox. Why on earth do they even need busybox if the base install already comes with full gnu coreutils? I remember Debian as the distro that Just Wroks(TM), when did it all go so wrong? Is anyone else here having similar issues, or am I doing something wrong?
when i see a debian user i see a future fedora user
When I see a Fedora user, I see a future Arch user btw
When I see an Arch user, I see a future NixOS user FWIW
idk i can do everything that arch can do, with distrobox and having a immutable distro on top
This is funny because on a laptop I had I did this exact same progression - I started on Debian, but it didn’t have the right kernel version for my audio drivers, so I switched to Fedora, but it was running slowly (probably because of gnome, it lets you choose so this was my fault) so I moved to arch (with xfce) because it has a reputation for being relatively lightweight. It worked better, but it took longer to get working with the unusual chromebook hardware.
Man a laptop new enough to require a newer kernel but slow enough for gnome to be slow. That's an annoying spot to be man.
It wasn’t that new (2017), it just had weird hardware which iirc only recently got supported without proprietary drivers by the new audio system.
That makes a lot more sense. I remember living with $200 laptops for a while and that's kinda what I was thinking initially.