this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1493 readers
8 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

another obviously correct opinion from Lucidity

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You're not a real data scientist unless you've written your own libraries in C??

I couldn't get past the inferiority complex masquerading as a confident appeal to authority.

Maybe the rest of the article was good but the taste of vomit wasn't worth it to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

1000 Years Thought Leader Jail

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You're not a real data scientist unless you've written your own libraries in C??

no one said this

if you had actually read the article instead of just reacting to it, you would probably understand that the purpose of the second paragraph is to lead to the first section where he tears down the field of data science as full of opportunistic hucksters, shambling in pantomime of knowledgeable people. he's bragging about his creds, sure, but it's pretty clearly there to lend credence that he knows what he's talking about when he starts talking about the people that "had not gotten as far as reading about it for thirty minutes" before trying to blindly pivot their companies to "AI".

I couldn't get past the inferiority complex masquerading as a confident appeal to authority.

hello? oh, yes, i'll have one drive-by projection with a side of name-dropped fallacy. yes, reddit-style please. and a large soda

Maybe the rest of the article was good but the taste of vomit wasn't worth it to me.

"not reading" isn't a virtue

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not God's gift to the field, but I am clearly better than most of my competition - that is, practitioners who haven't put in the reps to build their own C libraries in a cave with scraps, but can read textbooks and use libraries written by elite institutions.

I agree not reading isn't a virtue, but after reading something that caused my eyes to roll entirely out of my skull, I had to choose to cut the damage to my optic nerves.

Maybe the rest was good. That was bad. My critique is constrained to that specific, nauseating paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

christ just stop

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

i've always enjoyed* the style of HN comment "I stopped reading when I got to [basic historical fact I misread]"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

that's because you need to get good and read the entire works of Lucidity to improve yourself

sorry, it's you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Is it a common theme to shit on people for not having rollied their own C implemtations or was that a one off lapse of judgment on their part?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

you stopped reading already, so we'll never know

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

and they were just so proud to come here and brag about how they didn’t read the relatively short, extremely well-received article that is the topic of this thread, because they took issue with the tone of the second paragraph and decided policing that was an adequate replacement for reading and engaging with the fucking text

like, fuck almighty even if I’m quotemining a post I don’t like for sneering material I’m still at least skimming halfway, and we specialize in sneering at some real long-winded motherfuckers