this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
194 points (92.9% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3034 readers
1105 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The investigation was done by a private content mill, which makes the research a bit questionable given their interests - lots of potential for cherrypicking examples and so on. There aren't that many states mentioned in the article, but those that are were either blue already, or deeply-entrenched red states that wouldn't have made a difference at all in the final result even if there was an upset.
Also - would literally anything come out of this? Dems don't even have the spine to oppose monarchies (not making this shit up, look at the "few notes" section) let alone confront an active, powerful administration in a meaningful way.
I keep seeing headlines and links to substacks regarding this particular theory and while there's some smoke - I remain unconvinced.
The timing of Leo's purchase of that company is suspect. Pushing an uncertified update is suspect. The oddities in the numbers are suspect.
But no one has connected the dots in a satisfying way and that no one had pointed to what steps could be taken to verify suspicions. It feels half-baked. I would love to try and believe that more Americans voted for Kamala, but only for a "faith in humanity" kind of way. Proving widespread fraud feels a long way off.