this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
915 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

4329 readers
1390 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't get the obsession with reintroducing negatively charged words into the common language. Isn't english a rich enough language that there's an abundance of substitutes for words?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You may invent words as long as you like, but those words can definitely become corrupted as well. It will be an endless cycle.

The only way to stop that is to put our feet down and correct the misuse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Look at something written 500 years ago. 100 years ago. 50 years ago. Language changes all the time, and there is no stopping that. Yep, language is an endless cycle of switching out common words and adapting to social rules. I'd highly reccommend to follow that flow instead of trying to bring back the "good old days" when n-words and r-words were common and accepted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The guy is talking about an accepted phenomenon called the euphemism treadmill. Look it up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

You know what? I bite my thumb at you, sir.