this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
200 points (96.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43897 readers
1036 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hmmm yes I suppose that is true.
Nonetheless I'll always opt for the course of action that has the smallest potential negative impact on my personal life.
Well for a security professional, it should not be such a big deal.
My counterpoint to that is that if you're a good security professional, you wouldn't take such risks because your entire job revolves around mitigating risks.
If you break into a network, or have someone do it for you, it's very difficult to completely remove all evidence of that having occurred, and because there's just so many variables, there will always be a non-zero percent chance of it being traced back to you.
Your company can hire an entire security firm of security professionals to look for this evidence. I don't care who someone is or how good they are at their job, very few people, unless they have narcissistic personality disorder, would trust that their individual skill completely outweighs the combined skill of an entire team of people who do that every day as their occupation.
Furthermore, taking such extreme risks with ones future just screams that they have some mental problem which they should probably be talking to a professional about, because a typical person would consider taking any risk of being imprisoned for years for computer crimes too big of a risk.
With this argumentation, you could argue that a good security professional is not leaving the house, because the risk of something dangerous happening is definitely lower if he stays inside.
Comparing the allegory of my argument to yours, there is a very wide breadth between not going outside because something bad might happen and going outside and setting your cars driver seat on fire to show your wife that someone could potentially set your entire car on fire, leading to your wife calling the police, the police checking your neighbors security camera you didnt even realize existed to notice that you set the drivers seat on fire, and then charging you with mischief, arson, and public endangerment.