this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Men's Liberation

1853 readers
6 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

assumed feminism is for women

It's because of the name and history of fighting for women. The movement should have gone for "egalitarianism" if they didn't want people to think of women first/exclusively.

It's why I've vehemently rejected the label of feminist even when I'm in feminist spaces with feminist friends: I'm here for everyone, there's a word for that, use it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

It's because of the name and history of fighting for women

Sounds like different movement then. There is nothing wrong with saying feminism did its job and now we need equalism.

You might be okay with that refocus, but maaannnyyy feminist aren’t.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's petty and sexist as fuck. Literally the perfect example of toxic masculinity

It is the equivalent of only using soaps labeled "for men"

Do you need things gendered correctly for you to use it? Maybe your gender should've fought for equality first then. Maybe then you can have your Malenism or whatever you'd want it to be called

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Six-day-old troll account. Ignored.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Men's Liberation instance with dudes asking to change the name of feminism

But I'm the troll lmfaooo

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Please make an effort to understand the point someone is making before attacking it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Excuse me? Are you really this?

This man is against a movement that champions for him because the name is gendered towards a group that he doesn't identify with. He is resistant to it and the position it takes up because of the name.

There is no council of "the Feminists" who vote the name. This is a term that has evolved into this place, not one person put it this way and the absolute silly pettiness of it is his reason to oppose it?

And you think I'm failing to understand that position? You know who takes positions like that? Children.

foh my god how absolutely childish 🤣

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To address the least objectionable part of this comment (it bugs me and the rest has been covered already):

This is a term that has evolved into this place, not one person put it this way

How do you expect terms to evolve without people making arguments like this? You accept it as a fact that these terms evolve and are agreed upon somehow, but you're missing that this happens through individual people making points like this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why does it need to evolve? It is feminism you know what it is. You are for all of it but the name, so you won't support it?

And don't do what dummy above said and claim you support it but don't use the label because it is gendered. That is some privileged ass shit bro. Bore me to death out here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is feminism you know what it is.

I mean, we do, but a surprising amount of people don't. This is precisely why the name should evolve. Well, that and the perspective that the movement's goals have changed significantly enough from individual liberation of women to comprehensive equality of everyone, which should come with a corresponding change in the name. These are related.

You are for all of it but the name, so you won’t support it?

It's more that if people are informally introduced to the movement, their preconceptions are formed by its name. This can turn them off from seeking or accepting the real nature of the movement once it's explained to them. As a reminder, most people put very little thought into this sort of thing, so making a good impression for the people who are potential allies is important. You can argue that that's stupid and shouldn't be necessary, but it won't stop it from working like that.

And don’t do what dummy above said and claim you support it but don’t use the label because it is gendered.

I don't think I've ever encountered a situation where it's useful to directly say "I am a feminist" because it's generally clear from my other opinions, but I would if the situation required it. I do agree that an alternative label would be better, though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's not evolution lol that is forced rebranding because of how some dudes feel. If their hurdle is the term feminism then good, they're not ready to be adults.

Shake my god damn mother fuckin entire head bro. shake that shit left and then right over how foolish you boys are.

Horsepower, Butterfly, Literally, Blowjob, The Democraric People's Republic of Korea. You cool with that shit but not Feminism? Because your weiner isn't in the title????

Like bro there are still places called Indian Creek in America. Feminism is the term we gotta go after though?

I bet every dude saying this line of thought uses words like literally and doesn't bat an eye.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ok you're clearly just trolling. Let the record show that I tried anyway. Get well soon

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Yeah it’s a troll. Six-day-old account apparently created just for trolling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"They said something negative about my movement, they must be an enemy"

You assumed their gender, they did not mention it in the comment. Given the context, quite embarrassing.
You can't accept simple critique about a name. Their only complain of the movement is the name, that's a fucking good ally to have. I'm all in about the feminist movement, I acknowledge that it's about everyone, and I still see why some people would get confused.

Are you a troll? You must be a troll. If you are not, you really need to talk with someone about how incapable you are about receiving critique.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Terrible ally with a stupid stance if you don't understand that you're either being stupid or intentionally stupid

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Wow, talk about being childish.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

But they're not. They are simply saying that lay people assuming feminism is for feminine gender is to be expected as they may go on the face value of it. They aren't saying that the goal of feminism is anti men, rather they agree it is anti abuse due to patriarchal structures but the naming only brings confusion and irrational reactions for the uninformed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No. Reread what he said.

He is not a feminist because they should've renamed themselves. That's not a criticism, that's a stance of someone masquerading as an ally it is a well-known position many men take so they don't have to actually support the movement that works on their behalf.

That criticism has been used to bring genuine resistance to the movement and the fact all these dudes in here still say/think this shit shows why this person is a dummy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but is that the case for this specific person? Or are you using the general trend to attack someone in particular who may not exhibit the negative traits you associate with their position? Condemning someone as a fake ally when they are not is not a good move for several reasons.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So by inference, some lives don’t matter. Care to say which you consider disposable?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

If that is your inference you don't understand the reference

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Indeed. Wish I could give you a dozen upvotes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Except movements are often named after the oppressed group. Black Lives Matter, for example, doesn’t really want cops to only stop killing Black people. Black people are just disproportionately impacted.

Feminism is about raising up women’s status in society. That benefits men in the process though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

From an outsider, when I heard Black Lives Matter I thought the core goal was to value black lives more.

It’s less about what they “want” and more about what got them to protest… which is police behaviour towards black individuals, not everyone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Except movements are often named after the oppressed group

That's nice, but I don't care. Doing things in a stupid way because "that's how we've always done it" is literally conservativism, which I'm not really for.

This thread originates from a comment surprised that people would look at a gendered term and assume actions done in that name are for said gender, this should be an obvious and predictable outcome, one that's been seen countless times, and has a simple and easy fix

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No your position is dumb, it is petty and so silly and a perfect example of how dumb you're being. No one decided this. It just developed this way. Your critique is the name?

Feminism is an egalitarian movement that likely you'd not even know what the word meant had this movement not continued for its history. Feminism is the grandmother of almost any egalitarian movement today.

Fool. You're a petty fool

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

You don't win an argument with name calling