this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
46 points (72.1% liked)

Games

16806 readers
872 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

$300 for the GPU only. You still need the rest of the PC to play games. The CPU will be at least $150 for anything that will run newer games basically at all, and then your RAM will be at least another $50. Now add on the case, fans, cooler, and any other accessories and for a mid-to-low range PC you've already passed the price of a premium console.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A Ryzen 5600 is less than that and already beats the CPU in the PS5/X1X, especially in gaming.

The "mid-to-low range PC" already beats both consoles and when you consider that games are generally cheaper on PC and you don't have to subscribe to a service just to play online, you're quickly arriving at a point where PC gaming is cheaper while offering superior performance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The "mid-to-low range PC" already beats both consoles

But not for the money. The console manufacturers sell their systems at a loss, which is something PC part manufacturers can’t do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is entirely true, and you don't deserve the down votes from people who refuse to face it.

Building an equivalent system to a console, without a whole lot of luck being involved as far as finding deals goes, is likely to cost nearly double. This is speaking from experience, my current mid-tier PC, which almost performs as well as a current Gen console, cost about $400, and without, as said above, the ludicrous luck I had finding some deals, would've cost about $600, as the GPU alone, one that isn't actually very good at all, retails for over $300.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I've been a PC gamer for 3 decades. Most budget conscious PC gamers I know upgrade individual components as needed. Done this way, you can easily get more for your money than having to buy a new console every cycle.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

With consoles, you also run into the planned obselescense problem. If I bought an Xbox in 2015, I would now be at a point where the industry has decided my console belongs in a trash and I need to buy a new one if I want to play modern games. But with my relatively modest gaming PC I built in 2015, I can still play most modern games if I turn the graphics settings down. I haven't upgraded a single part in my 2015 build in years and it still works fine for my usage.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but if you don't have a PC, or one even remotely good enough, that cost is all up front.

Either way, you end up spending more on PC hardware than console hardware. For the price and for a person that isnt an enthusiast, they really don't have a need to go to PC, when console does everything they want.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

No one is arguing that PCs cost less than consoles. The original point made was that consoles were cheaper than graphics cards alone, which isn't exactly accurate

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget that games are significantly cheaper on PC, especially if you wait for the first sale (which'll come much quicker on PC). The upfront cost is indeed higher, but depending on how many games you buy you'll probably recoup that cost within one console generation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, technically every game can be free on PC. But overall anyone that has a gaming PC and a console will definitely be spending more on the PC, unless they are given PC parta for free or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The way I see it: PC has a high upfront cost with minimal maintenance/upgrade cost to continue using it with newer releases for years.

Consoles have a cheaper upfront cost but no maintenance/upgrade. Once it's obsolete (as determined by the industry, not the owner) then you are forced to buy a new console for new releases.

For me, in practice, I know for a fact that I have spent less on my PC components and games than I would if I wanted the same experience on a console.